<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Clue for Chris Locke</title>
	<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/</link>
	<description>The software industry from a rational perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Clifford</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9434</link>
		<author>John Clifford</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9434</guid>
		<description>I agree we youi and feel that  Chris's view of freedom of speech is distorted to want to protect misogynistic attacks. Using anonymous forums to spew hate is  not very intelligent use of the web and a sad indication of the level of integral development of some tech oriented folks. Feels pretty tribal and us versus them to me..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we youi and feel that  Chris&#8217;s view of freedom of speech is distorted to want to protect misogynistic attacks. Using anonymous forums to spew hate is  not very intelligent use of the web and a sad indication of the level of integral development of some tech oriented folks. Feels pretty tribal and us versus them to me..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Loughborough</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9408</link>
		<author>William Loughborough</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9408</guid>
		<description>It's a bit like letting someone verbally attack any demonized others.

If he took the site down AFTER she complained then was he so senseless as to think it would be OK until then?

We may not like it but we are not responsible ONLY for our own words/actions, but also those of our associates. 

Hard to believe that in the 21st century Chris can pretend to be the victim!

Love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit like letting someone verbally attack any demonized others.</p>
<p>If he took the site down AFTER she complained then was he so senseless as to think it would be OK until then?</p>
<p>We may not like it but we are not responsible ONLY for our own words/actions, but also those of our associates. </p>
<p>Hard to believe that in the 21st century Chris can pretend to be the victim!</p>
<p>Love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris hollander</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9267</link>
		<author>chris hollander</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2007/03/30/a-clue-for-chris-locke/#comment-9267</guid>
		<description>wel said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wel said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
