<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pimping</title>
	<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/</link>
	<description>The software industry from a rational perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-61</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hey, I was just pulling your chain.  But thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I was just pulling your chain.  But thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allenjs</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-60</link>
		<author>allenjs</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Sterling: good point -- I added two examples.  

Mark: Ordell made considerable income from other sources, if I remember correctly.  I mean, his livelihood sprung from his ability to concoct schemes, in which he enlisted the help of women, but he didn't technically get the bulk of his money directly *from* women.  So he was more old-school pimp than modern pimp; though he was overall a good archetype for the relationships between pimp and ho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sterling: good point &#8212; I added two examples.  </p>
<p>Mark: Ordell made considerable income from other sources, if I remember correctly.  I mean, his livelihood sprung from his ability to concoct schemes, in which he enlisted the help of women, but he didn&#8217;t technically get the bulk of his money directly *from* women.  So he was more old-school pimp than modern pimp; though he was overall a good archetype for the relationships between pimp and ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-56</link>
		<author>Mark MacLeod</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>A good example of what you're describing is Samuel L. Jackson's character (Ordell) in the movie Jackie Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good example of what you&#8217;re describing is Samuel L. Jackson&#8217;s character (Ordell) in the movie Jackie Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-55</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Yes, but you could expand on "...to adorn ... with flashy symbols for the purpose of impressing others.  It is most accurate when used to describe enhancements that most normal people would not spend any time or money on, and which are of questionable value..." with regard to software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but you could expand on &#8220;&#8230;to adorn &#8230; with flashy symbols for the purpose of impressing others.  It is most accurate when used to describe enhancements that most normal people would not spend any time or money on, and which are of questionable value&#8230;&#8221; with regard to software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allenjs</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-52</link>
		<author>allenjs</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Oh, it's pretty common in the industry right now -- "pimp your blog", "pimp Windows Live", and so on.  In addition, semantics and language precision are a common theme of this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it&#8217;s pretty common in the industry right now &#8212; &#8220;pimp your blog&#8221;, &#8220;pimp Windows Live&#8221;, and so on.  In addition, semantics and language precision are a common theme of this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-51</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/2006/06/27/pimping/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>And how this relates to software deserves a dissertation of its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how this relates to software deserves a dissertation of its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
